What Must Be Proved in A Medical Malpractice Lawsuit?
A person suing for medical malpractice will have to prove that a doctor failed to meet a professional standard and caused actual damages. A medical malpractice lawsuit can sue to look for recovery of medical bills incurred, loss of income, loss of earning capacity, mental stress, and pain or suffering.
Usually, in medical malpractice cases, both sides of the lawsuit will
present testimony to see if the standard of care has been met. The patient must show that it is more
likely than not that the doctor's failure to meet the standard of care caused
the harm. Every state has different rules and procedures for bringing medical
malpractice claims, but in general, they must be brought quickly. The statute
of limitations may be between six months and two years.
In some
cases, the patient may need to submit the claim to a panel of experts who
decide whether malpractice has actually happened. A failure to follow those
procedures can result in the dismissal of a plaintiff's claim. A plaintiff or
doctor may present the panel's findings to the court during the medical
malpractice lawsuit. This is not a lawsuit, but a pre-suit panel's finding that
there was no medical malpractice can affect the court's decision about
continuing with the case.
The outcome of most medical malpractice lawsuits turns on an expert's
testimony. If a plaintiff proves his or her case, his or her ability to recover
may be limited by a state cap on medical malpractice damages. The cap usually
caps noneconomic damages, rather than economic damages. This means that a
plaintiff can recover all of his or her medical bills and lost income, but he
or she cannot recover more than a certain sum with regard to loss of enjoyment,
loss of consortium, or pain and suffering. However, some states have enacted an
umbrella cap on medical malpractice damages overall.
If you have been injured and need help
understanding your options, contact Davy Yockey Today!
Comments
Post a Comment